I saw this when it first came out, at a drive-in theater
(where I saw most movies back in those days). I remember liking it quite a lot
… Far more than any of the "Man With No Name" films that started
Eastwood up the ladder to superstardom. Without the success of HANG 'EM HIGH, I'd even venture to suggest that
ladder might have turned out to be little more than a stepstool to mid-rank
stardom. As it was --- with plenty of savvy input and some hard demands made by
none other than Eastwood himself, via the deal he had brokered for the movie to
be a joint production between United Artists and Clint's newly formed Malpaso
Company --- HANG 'EM had the highest grossing weekend opening in United Artists'
history (exceeding even the James Bond films to that point) and went on to
become one of the top grossing films of the year.
In addition its popularity with audiences, it received
mostly positive critical reviews. Among its few detractors, however, was a
trash job from Variety (and I include this only because the wording
makes me chuckle) that stated the film was: "A poor American-made
imitation of a poor Italian-made imitation of an American-made Western."
Upon sitting down to watch this film all the way through
(not just snippets here and there as I was channel-surfing) for the purpose of
writing this piece, it occurred to me that I had not done so for a long time
--- too long, I concluded afterward.
I'd almost forgotten how tight and tense (although still
with plenty of action) the storyline was, and how many veteran character actors
it featured in sometimes very brief yet powerful secondary roles. Not that
you'd expect anything less from the likes of Ben Johnson, Bruce Dern, Dennis
Hopper, Charles McGraw, L.Q. Jones, Alan Hale Jr., James MacArthur, and Bob
Steele.
In major roles, along with Eastwood, there are Pat Hingle,
Ed Begley, and Inger Stevens also turning in fine, strong performances.
(Stevens, I gotta say, looks absolutely stunning and comes across very
convincing as a single-minded, embittered widow ever vigilant to check out the
fugitives brought before the court, in hopes of spotting the men who killed her
late husband and ravaged her; her character naturally becomes romantically
involved with Eastwood's in the movie --- and, long-standing rumor has it, a
similar affair took place in real life during the filming.)
The director was Ted Post --- one of Eastwood's demands,
hired in lieu of other contenders like John Sturges or Robert Aldrich. Post was
a veteran of many, many TV shows (including several episodes of Eastwood's
RAWHIDE series), several made-for-TV movies, and a dozen or so feature films
(such as BENEATH THE PLANET OF THE APES and MAGNUM FORCE, the second of the
"Dirty Harry" movies). Recognizing how much the momentum of his
career depended on HANG 'EM HIGH, Eastwood wanted a director whose style he was
both familiar with and trusted. He got what he wanted, and Post got what was
probably the best film he was able to sign his name to as a director.
The plot of HANG 'EM HIGH is fairly simple and
straightforward. Eastwood plays Jed Cooper, a former lawman wrongly accused of
rustling and then lynched by a vigilante band under the leadership of a former
army captain (Ed Begley). Due to a sloppy knot and the timely arrival of a U.S.
Deputy Marshal (Ben Johnson) Cooper survives. He's taken back to Fort Grant
before Judge Fenton (Pat Hingle) and cleared of any wrongdoing. (Fort Grant and
Judge Fenton are fictional counterparts for the real-life Fort Smith and
"the hanging judge" Isaac Parker.) Rather than head out on a mission
of personal vengeance (which would put him at odds with legal recourse) Cooper
is convinced to instead pin on the badge of a U.S. Deputy Marshal and proceed in
that manner.
Cooper proves to be an exceptional federal marshal but in
the course of bringing in various lawbreakers as assigned he also manages to
start picking off those who hung him. Eventually, the lynch mob members who are
left come looking to kill him --- which they nearly do --- and that forces a
final, bloody climax.
All in all, a damn good movie.
And, curiously, one that seems to be seldom featured on
lists of top Westerns as well in discussions of Eastwood's overall body of
work.
Nevertheless, if you haven't seen HANG 'EM HIGH in a while
--- or perhaps never --- you owe it to yourself to check it out. You won't be
sorry.
6 comments:
Judy and I saw this one in the theater, too, as we had the spaghetti westerns leading up to it. We were really hoping this one would be good, and needless to say we were very pleased when we left the theater.
I really like this movie, just as I like most of the Clint Eastwood movies.
We never had drive-in movies over in the UK, and I rather feel that we missed out on that experience.
But thank you for the review. It makes me want to see it again - even on DVD.
A long time favorite.
I haven't seen this one in so long, that I'm gonna rectify that ASAP!
Folks like to think his spaghetti westerns were career-defining, but I'm of your opinion that Eastwood wouldn't have gone far without his later work.
I like HANG 'EM HIGH a lot but not quite as much as the Sergio Leone films. I've watched it recently myself and agree that it should get a higher ranking among Western critics and fans.
Post a Comment