I
first saw this film when it aired on TV (probably WGN out of Chicago)
in the late Fifties. Since then it has been little seen and largely
out of circulation, though I understand it was available in VHS and
only recently on DVD.
It
made an impact on me for a number of reasons. First, by then (at the
tender age of 9 or 10) I had become quite interested in all things
Alamo. (This stemmed, at that point, mainly from the Disney-Davy
Crockett phenomenon that swept the country through the mid-Fifties
and from a great uncle who told me about visiting the actual Alamo
down in Texas and being able to still see bullet holes in the
structure.) Secondly, the Alamo sequence in this film had a number of
things in stark contrast to what had been presented by Disney ---
mainly that there were women and children present in the fort (which
I thought had to be an error) and then the portrayal of Davy
Crockett by actor Arthur Hunnicutt (more on that later). Third it was
my introduction to actor Sterling Hayden, whose work I would seek out
and enjoy in many movies thereafter --- and then enjoy as an author
much later on.
The
film is constructed around legendary Jim Bowie (played by Hayden). It
starts out a little slow and talky during the months leading up to
the breakout of the Texas war for independence from Mexico,
portraying Bowie (correctly) as a wealthy land owner and quite close
friend (exaggerated) of Mexican tyrant-on-the-rise Santa Ana. It
touches on the death of Bowie's wife and children due to the plague,
covers a restless period where Bowie is on the fence about which side
he should take, and then culminates in him taking charge of the
Texican volunteers at the Alamo and sharing overall command with
William Travis (played by Richard Carlson in probably his finest
role).
You
all know the story from there. The decision is made to defend the
Alamo at all costs, costing Santa Ana days and weeks of delay while
Sam Houston builds a true Texas army. Crockett, expected to arrive
with hundreds more volunteers only shows up with 29; Fannin's
reinforcements due to come from Goliad breaks down and can't make it
in time; the line in the sand is drawn --- cross over if you're
willing to fight to the death, take your chances and flee if not
(with all crossing over). And then the rousing final battle where 180
go down fighting bravely against several thousand.
Produced
and released through Republic Pictures, this is a considerably more
ambitious feature than the Disney feature (which was originally made
for TV) though not nearly on the scale of John Wayne's epic THE ALAMO
which would come five years later. The well known back story is that
Wayne, who was Republic's biggest star for many years, had long
wanted to make a film about the Alamo. Herbert J. Yates, the head of
Republic, strung him along for a number of years. A script was even
written and approved. But Wayne, wanting control to tell the Alamo
story his way, insisted on producing and directing the film;
Yates wanted him only as a star. Wayne left Republic Pictures over
the dispute and Yates refused to release the prepared script to him.
In the end, once Wayne's version was completed and released in 1960,
there are a couple key scenes that closely mirror each other and of
course the overarching story is the same. But otherwise the two films
have their own distinctions and both, in my opinion, turned out
pretty good.
Though
THE LAST COMMAND did not receive an extravagant budget (such as
Wayne's later version) it nevertheless was made to high production
standards. It was produced and directed by Frank Lloyd (a two-time
Academy Award winner). The musical score was by acclaimed Max Steiner
(complete with title lyrics sung by Gordon MacRae, at that time super
hot as the star of Oklahoma! on Broadway).
As
Bowie, Hayden does his usual competent, low key job. As Travis,
Richard Carlson (fresh from appearances in numerous sci-fi and horror
B movies, including Creature From the Black Lagoon the year
before) gives perhaps one of the best Travis portrayals I've seen to
date; his speech upon drawing the
cross-over-if-you're-willing-to-fight scene (which may not have ever
truly happened in real life, but is great drama nevertheless) is
stirring and the intensity on his face and in his eyes during the
final battle seems to fit perfectly. In a relatively small role as a
fictional love interest to Bowie, Anna Marie Alberghetti does an okay
job (come on, for an Italian opera star playing a Mexican contessa,
you gotta cut her some slack). The previously mentioned, Arthur
Hunnicutt plays the Crockett role as yet another cantankerous old
Indian fighter, the mold he fit comfortably in on so many other
occasions (The Big Sky, El Dorado, to name a couple classics);
he's always a joy to watch and listen to, but his Crockett is not
only a distinct departure from other interpretations but somehow
seems a little too backwoodsy for a man who traveled the
country and served in Congress. The rest of the cast is filled out
nicely by numerous character actors giving solid performances ---
Ernest Borgnine, John Russell, Jim Davis, and Slim Pickens among
them. Finally, J. Carroll Naish gives an interesting performance as
Santa Ana, making him pompous and ambitious yet at the same time a
bit sympathetic, something never done in other Alamo films.
When
the final battle comes, it is rousing and exciting and very well
done, even though the budget allowed, appearance-wise, for a very
scaled down version of the old mission and the “horde” of Mexican
soldiers seems stretched a mite thin in a few scenes.
All
and all, THE LAST COMMAND is rousing and entertaining. As big a John
Wayne fan as I am and much as it pains me to admit it, it stacks up
very well in many regards against Duke's bloated, long-winded epic
(which I still like a lot) and is considerably better than the dark,
dour 2004 ALAMO starring Billy Bob Thornton.
It
is now playing regularly on the Starz Western channel and well worth
keeping an eye peeled for.